Insights: News Kilpatrick's Dan Englander Publishes Practical Guidance Practice Note on "International Trademark Filing Systems"
Atlanta-based partner Dan Englander recently published a Practical Guidance Practice Note on LexisNexis titled "International Trademark Filing Systems."
The Practice Note provides a high-level overview of international trademark filing systems, including the Madrid Protocol, the EU Trademark, filings in Benelux region, filings in Africa via the African Intellectual Property Organization and the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization. Access the article on LexisNexis here.
Dan Englander is a trademark lawyer for international brands. He helps brands choose trademarks and entertainment titles with a practical view of real-world risks, manages large international trademark portfolios, and leads portfolio expansion projects through national applications, priority applications, and Madrid filings. Dan also oversees a large portfolio of contentious trademark matters, including many business-critical, multijurisdictional trademark disputes.
Learn more about Kilpatrick's Trademark, Copyright & Advertising practice.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
